Title of article
Reasoned modelling critics: Turning failed proofs into modelling guidance
Author/Authors
Andrew Ireland and Jamie Stark ، نويسنده , , Gudmund Grov، نويسنده , , Maria Teresa Llano، نويسنده , , Michael Butler، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
17
From page
293
To page
309
Abstract
The activities of formal modelling and reasoning are closely related. But while the rigour of building formal models brings significant benefits, formal reasoning remains a major barrier to the wider acceptance of formalism within design. Here we propose reasoned modelling critics — an approach which aims to abstract away from the complexities of low-level proof obligations, and provide high-level modelling guidance to designers when proofs fail. Inspired by proof planning critics, the technique combines proof-failure analysis with modelling heuristics. Here, we present the details of our proposal, implement them in a prototype and outline future plans.
Keywords
Reasoned modelling , formal methods , Formal modelling , formal verification , Automated reasoning , artificial intelligence
Journal title
Science of Computer Programming
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Science of Computer Programming
Record number
1080323
Link To Document