• Title of article

    A comparison of WEPP and SWAT for modeling soil erosion of the Zhangjiachong Watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

  • Author/Authors

    Z.Y Shen، نويسنده , , Y.W. Gong، نويسنده , , Y.H. Li، نويسنده , , Q. Hong، نويسنده , , L. Xu، نويسنده , , R.M. Liu، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    1435
  • To page
    1442
  • Abstract
    Soil and water conservation is important for the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China, and quantification of soil loss is a significant issue. In this study, two widely used models – the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) – were applied to simulate runoff and sediment yield for the Zhangjiachong Watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. The models were run and the simulated runoff and sediment yield values were compared with the measured runoff and sediment yield values. In the calibration period, the model efficiency (ENS) values for the WEPP and SWAT were 0.864 and 0.711 for runoff, and 0.847 and 0.678 for sediment yield, respectively. In the validation period, the ENS values for WEPP and SWAT were 0.835 and 0.690 for runoff, and 0.828 and 0.818 for sediment yield, respectively. The results of ENS and the other criteria indicate that the results of both models were acceptable. WEPP simulations were better than SWAT in most cases, and could be used with a reasonable confidence for soil loss quantification in the Zhangjiachong Watershed.
  • Keywords
    Runoff , Sediment yield , calibration , Sensitivity analysis , validation , MUSLE
  • Journal title
    Agricultural Water Management
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    Agricultural Water Management
  • Record number

    1326082