Title of article
The Impact of Pituitary Blockage with GnRH Antagonist and Gonadotrophin Stimulation Length on The Outcome of ICSI Cycles in Women Older than 36 Years
Author/Authors
Santana، Rosane نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Souza Setti، Amanda نويسنده Sapientiae Institute, Educational and Research Center in Assisted Reproduction, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Guilherme Maldonado، Luiz نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Montenegro Valente، Fernanda نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Iaconelli، Carla نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Iaconelli Jr، Assumpto نويسنده Fertility - Assisted Fertilization Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Borges Jr، Edson نويسنده Fertility - Assisted Fertilization Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil ,
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 30 سال 2014
Pages
8
From page
135
To page
142
Abstract
Background: The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether
the length of pituitary blockage with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists
or the stimulation period influence intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes
in patients older than 36 years of age.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 138 couples with maternal
age > 36 years undergoing ICSI with an antagonist protocol were included. The influences
of stimulation and suppression length on the response to ovarian stimulation and ICSI
outcomes were investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was
performed to assess the predictive value of the stimulation period for achievement of
implantation and pregnancy.
Results: The gonadotrophin stimulation length negatively influenced the implantation
rate (RC: -4.200; p=0.023). The area under ROC curve (AUC) could distinguish between
women with positive and negative implantation (AUC: 0.611; CI: 0.546-0.673)
and pregnancy (AUC: 0.593; CI: 0.528-0.656). The threshold value demonstrated a high
negative predictive value on likelihood of implantation (p=0.0032, 90% sensitivity) and
pregnancy (p=0.0147, 87.1% sensitivity) when patients underwent more than 10 days of
stimulation.
Conclusion: The stimulation period negatively influences the implantation rate in women
older than 36 years. A stimulation interval greater than 10 days is associated with a negative
predictive value for the chance of implantation and pregnancy.
Journal title
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Record number
1349215
Link To Document