• Title of article

    Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2

  • Author/Authors

    Cojazzi، G. نويسنده , , Fogli، D. نويسنده , , Grassini، G. نويسنده , , Gelder، P. De نويسنده , , Gryffroy، D. نويسنده , , Bolado، R. نويسنده , , Hofer، E. نويسنده , , Virolainen، R. نويسنده , , Coe، I.M. نويسنده , , Bassanelli، A. نويسنده , , Puga، J. نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
  • Pages
    -210
  • From page
    211
  • To page
    0
  • Abstract
    This article summarizes objectives and aims of the concerted action ʹBenchmark Exercise on Expert Judgment Techniques in PSA Level 2ʹ and the results obtained within the project. The project was organized in three phases, namely a survey phase (pre-phase), a first phase devoted to parameter estimation assessment and a second phase devoted to benchmarking expert judgment methods on a scenario development case. The paper is focused on the first phase and on the results obtained by the application of five structured Expert Judgment (EJ) methodologies to the problem at hand. The results of the comparison of EJ methodologies are also provided; they are based on the use of some metrics suitably designed during the project. The context of Phase 2 and the issue to be tackled in this phase are briefly described: since this phase has been carried out only at a preliminary level (mainly after the end of the project), the results obtained are not reported here in detail but are only briefly commented on.
  • Keywords
    Euratom Framework Programme , Key action Nuclear Fission , Operational safety of existing installations , Plant life extension and management (PLEM) , Severe accident management (SAM) and evolutionary concepts (EVOL)
  • Journal title
    Nuclear Engineering and Design
  • Serial Year
    2001
  • Journal title
    Nuclear Engineering and Design
  • Record number

    13608