Title of article
Acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression
Author/Authors
Buist، نويسنده , , Anne and Condon، نويسنده , , John and Brooks، نويسنده , , Janette and Speelman، نويسنده , , Craig and Milgrom، نويسنده , , Jeannette and Hayes، نويسنده , , Barbara and Ellwood، نويسنده , , David and Barnett، نويسنده , , Bryanne and Kowalenko، نويسنده , , Nick and Matthey، نويسنده , , Stephen F. Austin، نويسنده , , Marie-Paule and Bilszta، نويسنده , , Justin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
5
From page
233
To page
237
Abstract
Background
ess the acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression.
tal women (n = 860) and health professionals (n = 916) were surveyed after 3 years of routine perinatal (antenatal and postnatal) use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).
s
0% of women had the screening explained to them and found the EPDS easy to complete; 85% had no difficulties completing it. Discomfort with screening was significantly related to having a higher EPDS score. A majority of health professionals using the EPDS was comfortable and found it useful.
tions
mple involved only maternity services supporting depression screening. In addition, the response rate from GPs was low.
sions
e screening with the EPDS is acceptable to most women and health professionals. Sensitive explanation, along with staff training and support, is essential in implementing depression screening.
Keywords
postnatal depression , Acceptability of screening
Journal title
Journal of Affective Disorders
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Journal of Affective Disorders
Record number
1431466
Link To Document