Title of article
Feasibility versus sustainability in urban water management
Author/Authors
Markus Starkl، نويسنده , , Markus and Brunner، نويسنده , , Norbert، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
16
From page
245
To page
260
Abstract
Decision making in urban water management is exemplified by the case of Austria: Although researchers define a comprehensible concept of sustainability, practitioners emphasize feasibility and accept limitations in sustainability. Could the specification of particular methods, chosen from some decision support methodology, remedy this situation? While an integrative assessment of sustainability should not be based on prescribed or standardized criteria, or even a certain assessment method, it should force the decision makers to make their chosen premise more visible. To this end a change of the decision making process is proposed, which will allow the decision makers to adapt the decision making process to the circumstances of a specific project in a way that is accepted by the stakeholders.
Keywords
Decision making process , Multicriteria decision support method , Tendering , Subsidies , Social welfare theory , Urban water management
Journal title
Journal of Environmental Management
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Journal of Environmental Management
Record number
1580189
Link To Document