Title of article
Which is the best deprivation predictor of foetal and infant mortality rates?
Author/Authors
Joyce ، نويسنده , , R and Webb، نويسنده , , R and Peacock، نويسنده , , JL and Stirland، نويسنده , , H، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages
4
From page
21
To page
24
Abstract
This study investigates which, if any, population-based indicator of deprivation best predicts foetal and infant mortality rates in England. For the year 1995, the deprivation levels of 364 English Local Authorities were compared; using the three commonly used indicators, Jarman score, Townsend score and percentage unemployed. The predictive value of these for stillbirth, neonatal and infant mortality rates was then calculated. The three deprivation indicators were highly inter-correlated (r=0.866–0.924). For each mortality rate, the correlation with deprivation did not differ significantly for the three indicators of deprivation. We conclude, when comparing these outcomes in different areas of England, that any of the three deprivation indicators may be used to adjust for deprivation. Public Health (2000) 114, 21–24.
Keywords
Stillbirth , Infant mortality , England , Deprivation
Journal title
Public Health
Serial Year
2000
Journal title
Public Health
Record number
1586815
Link To Document