Title of article
Determination of S-nitrosoglutathione in plasma: Comparison of two methods
Author/Authors
Bramanti، نويسنده , , Emilia and Angeli، نويسنده , , Valeria and Mester، نويسنده , , Zoltan and Pompella، نويسنده , , Alfonso and Paolicchi، نويسنده , , Aldo and D’Ulivo، نويسنده , , Alessandro، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages
5
From page
1295
To page
1299
Abstract
In this work we compared the results of the GSNO determination in human plasma by two independent methods. The first method is based on the pre-column derivatization of GSNO thiolic part by p-hydroxymercury benzoate (PHMB) and followed by the determination of GS-PHMB product by reversed phase chromatography coupled to chemical vapour generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (RPC-CVGAFS). The second method is based on RPC separation of GSNO from interfering compounds and the post-column, on-line enzymatic hydrolysis of GSNO by commercial γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and fluorescence detection.
nous GSNO was determined only in plasma from blood sampled by syringe (not by Vacutainers®) and ranged between 157 and 257 nM on the basis of RPC-CVGAFS method, and between 90 and 225 nM by RPC-FD method. There was a good correlation between the two methods (slope = 1.06 ± 0.09, R2 = 0.9543). RPC-CVGAFS method based on PHMB derivatization determined a GSNO concentration 60 ± 20 nM in excess with respect to RPC-FD method. Sampling issues connected with common blood sampling procedures like venipuncture and sampling in syringe or Vacutainers® still introduce in GSNO analysis unknown factors, which require further investigations.
Keywords
GSNO , Nitrosoglutathione , chromatography , Method validation
Journal title
Talanta
Serial Year
2010
Journal title
Talanta
Record number
1637239
Link To Document