• Title of article

    Determination of S-nitrosoglutathione in plasma: Comparison of two methods

  • Author/Authors

    Bramanti، نويسنده , , Emilia and Angeli، نويسنده , , Valeria and Mester، نويسنده , , Zoltan and Pompella، نويسنده , , Alfonso and Paolicchi، نويسنده , , Aldo and D’Ulivo، نويسنده , , Alessandro، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    1295
  • To page
    1299
  • Abstract
    In this work we compared the results of the GSNO determination in human plasma by two independent methods. The first method is based on the pre-column derivatization of GSNO thiolic part by p-hydroxymercury benzoate (PHMB) and followed by the determination of GS-PHMB product by reversed phase chromatography coupled to chemical vapour generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (RPC-CVGAFS). The second method is based on RPC separation of GSNO from interfering compounds and the post-column, on-line enzymatic hydrolysis of GSNO by commercial γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and fluorescence detection. nous GSNO was determined only in plasma from blood sampled by syringe (not by Vacutainers®) and ranged between 157 and 257 nM on the basis of RPC-CVGAFS method, and between 90 and 225 nM by RPC-FD method. There was a good correlation between the two methods (slope = 1.06 ± 0.09, R2 = 0.9543). RPC-CVGAFS method based on PHMB derivatization determined a GSNO concentration 60 ± 20 nM in excess with respect to RPC-FD method. Sampling issues connected with common blood sampling procedures like venipuncture and sampling in syringe or Vacutainers® still introduce in GSNO analysis unknown factors, which require further investigations.
  • Keywords
    GSNO , Nitrosoglutathione , chromatography , Method validation
  • Journal title
    Talanta
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Talanta
  • Record number

    1637239