Title of article
Autonomy, Beneficence, Justice, and the Limits of Provider Profiling
Author/Authors
Shahian، نويسنده , , David M. and Normand، نويسنده , , Sharon-Lise T. Normand، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages
4
From page
2383
To page
2386
Abstract
Public reporting of clinical outcomes data is but one response to calls for increasing transparency in health care. Cardiac surgical operations are among the most commonly performed complex operative procedures. Risk-adjusted cardiac surgery mortality rate data for individual cardiac surgeons are currently available for >25% of the U.S. population as well as for Great Britain and Ireland. Although cardiologists are the primary source of referral of patients for cardiac surgery, surveys of cardiologists and analysis of market share data indicate this information is not being used to refer to cardiac surgeons with the lowest mortality rates. We review the ethical principles that should obligate cardiologists to discuss and use outcomes data, when available, in selecting cardiac surgeons to whom they refer their patients.
Keywords
Mortality rate , Informed Consent , profiling , Outcomes , ETHICS
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2012
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
1743602
Link To Document