• Title of article

    High-Dose Atorvastatin Reduces Periodontal Inflammation: A Novel Pleiotropic Effect of Statins

  • Author/Authors

    Subramanian، نويسنده , , Sharath and Emami، نويسنده , , Hamed and Vucic، نويسنده , , Esad and Singh، نويسنده , , Parmanand and Vijayakumar، نويسنده , , Jayanthi and Fifer، نويسنده , , Kenneth M. and Alon، نويسنده , , Achilles and Shankar، نويسنده , , Sudha S. and Farkouh، نويسنده , , Michael and Rudd، نويسنده , , James H.F. and Fayad، نويسنده , , Zahi A. and Van Dyke، نويسنده , , Thomas E. and Tawakol، نويسنده , , Ahmed، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    2382
  • To page
    2391
  • Abstract
    Objectives rpose of this study was to test whether high-dose statin treatment would result in a reduction in periodontal inflammation as assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT). ound ontal disease (PD) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. s -three adults with risk factors or with established atherosclerosis and who were not taking high-dose statins were randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg vs. 10 mg in a multicenter, double-blind trial to evaluate the impact of atorvastatin on arterial inflammation. Subjects were evaluated using FDG-PET/CT at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks. Arterial and periodontal tracer activity was assessed while blinded to treatment allocation, clinical characteristics, and temporal sequence. Periodontal bone loss (an index of PD severity) was evaluated using contrast-enhanced CT images while blinded to clinical and imaging data. s y-one subjects completed the study, and 59 provided periodontal images for analysis. At baseline, areas of severe PD had higher target-to-background ratio (TBR) compared with areas without severe PD (mean TBR: 3.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.36 to 4.30] vs. 3.18 [95% CI: 2.91 to 3.44], p = 0.004). After 12 weeks, there was a significant reduction in periodontal inflammation in patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg vs. 10 mg (ΔTBR 80 mg vs. 10 mg group: mean −0.43 [95% CI: −0.83 to −0.02], p = 0.04). Between-group differences were greater in patients with higher periodontal inflammation at baseline (mean −0.74 [95% CI: −1.29 to −0.19], p = 0.01) and in patients with severe bone loss at baseline (−0.61 [95% CI: −1.16 to −0.054], p = 0.03). Furthermore, the changes in periodontal inflammation correlated with changes in carotid inflammation (R = 0.61, p < 0.001). sions ose atorvastatin reduces periodontal inflammation, suggesting a newly recognized effect of statins. Given the concomitant changes observed in periodontal and arterial inflammation, these data raise the possibility that a portion of that beneficial impact of statins on atherosclerosis relate to reductions in extra-arterial inflammation, for example, periodontitis. (Evaluate the Utility of 18FDG-PET as a Tool to Quantify Atherosclerotic Plaque; NCT00703261)
  • Keywords
    atherosclerosis , Imaging , inflammation , Nuclear medicine , statins
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    1757797