• Title of article

    Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel–dentine junction shape

  • Author/Authors

    Smith، نويسنده , , T.M. and Olejniczak، نويسنده , , A.J. and Reid، نويسنده , , D.J. and Ferrell، نويسنده , , R.J. and Hublin، نويسنده , , J.J.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    22
  • From page
    974
  • To page
    995
  • Abstract
    Summary tudy examines cross-sections of molar crowns in a diverse modern human sample to quantify variation in enamel thickness and enamel–dentine junction (EDJ) shape. Histological sections were generated from molars sectioned buccolingually across mesial cusps. Enamel cap area, dentine area, EDJ length, and bi-cervical diameter were measured on micrographs using a digitizing tablet. Nine landmarks along the EDJ were defined, and X and Y coordinates were digitized in order to quantify EDJ shape. Upper molars show greater values for the components of enamel thickness, leading to significantly greater average enamel thickness than in lower molars. Average enamel thickness increased significantly from M1 to M3 in both molar rows, due to significantly increasing enamel cap area in upper molars, and decreasing dentine area in lower molars. Differences in EDJ shape were found among maxillary molars in combined and individual populations. Sex differences were also found; males showed significantly greater dentine area, EDJ length, and bi-cervical diameters in certain tooth types, which resulted in females having significantly thicker average enamel. Differences in enamel thickness and EDJ shape within molars were also found among populations, although few consistent trends were evident. This study demonstrates that enamel thickness and EDJ shape vary among molars, between sexes, and among populations; these factors must be considered in the categorization and comparison of ape and human molars, particularly when isolated teeth or fossil taxa are included. Human relative enamel thickness encompasses most values reported for fossil apes and humans, suggesting limited taxonomic value when considered alone.
  • Keywords
    Average enamel thickness , Relative enamel thickness , Dentine area , Enamel cap area , Enamel–dentine junction (EDJ) length , EDJ shape , Hominoids , Fossil hominids
  • Journal title
    Archives of Oral Biology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    Archives of Oral Biology
  • Record number

    1803816