Title of article
Management of cardiac arrest caused by coronary artery spasm: Epinephrine/adrenaline versus nitrates
Author/Authors
Kiss، نويسنده , , Gabor and Corre، نويسنده , , Olivier and Gueret، نويسنده , , Gildas and Nguyen Ba، نويسنده , , Vinh and Gilard، نويسنده , , Martine and Boschat، نويسنده , , Jaques and Arvieux، نويسنده , , Charles Chistian، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
5
From page
228
To page
232
Abstract
Background
pulmonary resuscitation guidelines imply the use of epinephrine/adrenaline during cardiopulmonary arrest. However, in cardiac arrest situations resulting from coronary artery spasm (CAS), the use of epinephrine/adrenaline could be deleterious.
s and Results
ear-old patient underwent an emergency coronarography with an attempt to stent the coronary arteries. Radiologic imaging revealed a positive methylergonovine maleate (Methergine, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) test, with subocclusive CAS in several coronary vessels leading to electromechanical dissociation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and intracoronary boluses of isosorbide dinitrate were given to treat CAS. Epinephrine/adrenaline was not administered during resuscitation. Spontaneous circulation was obtained after cardioversion for ventricular fibrillation, and the patient progressively regained consciousness.
sion
itation guidelines do not specify the use of trinitrate derivatives in cardiac arrest situations caused by CAS. The pros and cons of the use of nitrates and epinephrine/adrenaline during cardiac arrest caused by CAS are analyzed in this case report.
Journal title
Heart and Lung
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
Heart and Lung
Record number
1859032
Link To Document