Title of article
Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery
Author/Authors
April D. and MacDermid، نويسنده , , Joy C. and Drosdowech، نويسنده , , Darren and Faber، نويسنده , , Ken، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
8
From page
407
To page
414
Abstract
A consecutive series of patients (n = 149) completed 4 self-reporting scales (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire; Simple Shoulder Test [SST]; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff [WORC] questionnaire; and Short Form 36 [SF-36]) during the week before rotator cuff repair and 6 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who had a positive response on all 3 upper extremity scales (n = 86) were classified as positive responders, those who did not demonstrate a consistent direction of response across scales were labeled as equivocal responders (n = 36), and those with a negative response across all 3 scales were labeled as negative responders (n = 15). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated. The WORC questionnaire (SRM, 2.0) and SST (SRM, 1.8) were most responsive to detecting improvement, followed by the DASH questionnaire (SRM, 1.6). The SF-36 was least responsive, with the largest effect on health being noted in the SF-36 subscale on bodily pain (SRM, 1.1). Pearson correlations indicated moderate associations between change scores across upper limb scales (r = 0.68-0.72) and lower associations with SF-36 physical summary scores (r = 0.40-0.50). Mental health scores were lower at baseline and changed more negatively in patients who did not have a positive response to surgery. No best scale can be identified at this time.
Journal title
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Record number
1867231
Link To Document