• Title of article

    Importance of Adjunctive Heart Failure Optimization Immediately After Implantation to Improve Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

  • Author/Authors

    Mullens، نويسنده , , Wilfried and Kepa، نويسنده , , Jacek and De Vusser، نويسنده , , Philippe and Vercammen، نويسنده , , Jan and Rivero-Ayerza، نويسنده , , Maximo and Wagner، نويسنده , , Patrick and Dens، نويسنده , , Joseph and Vrolix، نويسنده , , Mathias and Vandervoort، نويسنده , , Pieter and Tang، نويسنده , , W.H. Wilson، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    409
  • To page
    415
  • Abstract
    Despite improvement in morbidity and mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), disease progression continues to affect a subset of patients and there is limited effort to identify contributing factors. Our objective was to investigate if a protocol-driven approach incorporated in a management strategy of heart failure immediately after implantation would provide incremental benefits beyond usual care after implantation. We reviewed 114 consecutive patients with CRT implanted from 2005 through 2009 who received usual care after implantation or underwent protocol-driven CRT care after implantation. Preimplantation characteristics in patients receiving usual versus protocol-driven care were similar in left ventricular (LV) dimension (LV internal diastolic diameter 6.2 ± 0.8 vs 6.4 ± 1.0 cm), LV ejection fraction (26 ± 8% vs 25% ± 8%), QRS width, and medication usage. Major adjustments during the protocol-driven approach were uptitration of neurohormonal blockers (64%), echocardiographically guided atrioventricular optimization (50%), heart failure education (42%), arrhythmia management (19%), and LV lead repositioning (7%). Although positive LV remodeling was noted in the 2 groups at 6 months, extent was significantly greater in the protocol-driven approach compared to usual care (change in LV internal diastolic diameter 0.7 ± 0.6 cm vs 0.2 ± 1.2 cm, p = 0.01; change in LV ejection fraction 11 ± 7% vs 7 ± 9%, p = 0.01), which was associated with fewer major adverse events (14% vs 53%, p <0.001). In conclusion, a protocol-driven approach for patients with CRT started immediately after implantation is associated with incremental favorable effects on reverse remodeling and fewer adverse events compared to usual care after implantation. These effects appeared to be driven not only by changes in device settings and arrhythmia management but also by concomitant medication optimization and heart failure education.
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Record number

    1901135