• Title of article

    Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate Cardiac Sarcoidosis from Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

  • Author/Authors

    David Steckman، نويسنده , , David A. and Schneider، نويسنده , , Preston M. and Schuller، نويسنده , , Joseph L. and Aleong، نويسنده , , Ryan G. and Nguyen، نويسنده , , Duy T. and Sinagra، نويسنده , , Gianfranco and Vitrella، نويسنده , , Giancarlo and Brun، نويسنده , , Francesca and Cova، نويسنده , , Maria A. and Pagnan، نويسنده , , Lorenzo and Mestroni، نويسنده , , Luisa and Varosy، نويسنده , , Paul D. ، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    575
  • To page
    579
  • Abstract
    Some patients diagnosed with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are eventually found to have cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Accurate differentiation between these 2 conditions has implications for immunosuppressive therapy and familial screening. We sought to determine whether cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be used to identify the characteristic findings to accurately differentiate between CS and ARVC. Consecutive patients with a diagnostic MRI scan indicating CS and/or ARVC constituted the cohort. All patients diagnosed with CS had histologic confirmation of sarcoidosis, and all patients with ARVC met the diagnostic task force criteria. The cardiac MRI data were retrospectively analyzed to identify possible differentiating characteristics. Of the patients, 40 had CS and 21 had ARVC. Those with CS were older and had more left ventricular scar. The presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy or left ventricular septal involvement was seen exclusively in the patients with CS (p <0.001). A family history of sudden cardiac death was seen only in the ARVC group (p = 0.012). The right ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular volumes were also significantly different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, patients with CS have significantly different cardiac MRI characteristics than patients with ARVC. The cardiac volume, in addition to the degree and location of cardiac involvement, can be used to distinguish between these 2 disease entities. The presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and left ventricular septal scar favors a diagnosis of CS and not ARVC. Consideration of CS should be given if these MRI findings are observed during the evaluation for possible ARVC.
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Serial Year
    2012
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Record number

    1902635