Title of article
Value of Electrocardiographic and Ankle–Brachial Index Abnormalities for Prediction of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Author/Authors
Bagheri، نويسنده , , Roshanak and Schutta، نويسنده , , Mark and Cumaranatunge، نويسنده , , Reshmaal Gomes and Wolfe، نويسنده , , Megan L. and Terembula، نويسنده , , Karen and Hoffman، نويسنده , , Barry and Schwartz، نويسنده , , Stan and Kimmel، نويسنده , , Stephen E. and Farouk، نويسنده , , Samira and Iqbal، نويسنده , , Nayyar and Reilly، نويسنده , , Muredach P.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
5
From page
951
To page
955
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, in part due to accelerated subclinical atherosclerosis. Electrocardiographic (ECG) and ankle–brachial index (ABI) abnormalities are used to screen for cardiovascular risk in the clinic. However, their capacity to identify patients with type 2 DM with nonobstructive subclinical atherosclerosis is unknown. Associations of ECG and ABI abnormalities with coronary artery calcium (CAC), a measure of coronary atherosclerosis, were examined using multivariable ordinal regression modeling in 589 asymptomatic patients with type 2 DM. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined. CAC was prevalent (44% CAC >100; 32% CAC >75th percentile score) despite normal electrocardiograms (64%) and ABIs (97%) in most subjects. Neither ECG nor ABI changes predicted CAC after adjusting for age, gender, and race. ECG abnormalities were neither sensitive nor specific for detection of CAC >100, >400, or >75th percentile (sensitivities 0.43, 0.45, and 0.34; specificities 0.69, 0.66, and 0.63, respectively). ABI abnormalities were not sensitive (0.03, 0.04, and 0.03) but had high specificity (0.98, 0.98, and 0.98). In subjects with normal electrocardiograms and ABIs, extensive CAC was remarkably prevalent (CAC >100 in 24%). In conclusion, ECG and ABI abnormalities failed to detect patients with subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and therefore may be of limited value in identifying many asymptomatic patients with type 2 DM at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1902888
Link To Document