Title of article
Comparison of Stent Length Reported by the Stentʹs Manufacturer to That Determined by Quantitative Coronary Angiography at the Time of Implantation Versus That Determined by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography at a Later Time
Author/Authors
Ciszewski، نويسنده , , Michal and Zalewska، نويسنده , , Joanna and Pregowski، نويسنده , , Jerzy and Mintz، نويسنده , , Gary S. and Kepka، نويسنده , , Cezary and Kalinczuk، نويسنده , , Lukasz and Kruk، نويسنده , , Mariusz and Jastrzebski، نويسنده , , Jan and Witkowski، نويسنده , , Adam، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
6
From page
1111
To page
1116
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess whether coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) would allow accurate length measurements that may help select optimal stent length. In 19 patients who underwent stent implantation and CCTA, the lengths of 30 implanted stents were assessed independently using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at the time of implantation and CCTA during follow-up. Measurements on CCTA and QCA were compared with the actual lengths of the implanted stents. The mean actual stent length was 17.3 ± 6.3 mm; the mean length of the stents measured using CCTA was 17.25 ± 5.54 mm, and the mean length of the stents measured using QCA was 15.92 ± 5.86 mm. There was a stronger positive correlation between measurements on CCTA versus actual stent lengths (R = 0.99, p = 0.0001) than between measurements on QCA versus actual stent lengths (R = 0.82, p = 0.0001) (p <0.0001 for the difference between correlation coefficients). In conclusion, the length measurements obtained with CCTA correlate better with an anatomic gold standard (actual stent lengths) than those obtained using QCA.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1903414
Link To Document