Title of article
Comparison between sequential and simultaneous application of activated carbon with membrane bioreactor for trace organic contaminant removal
Author/Authors
Nguyen، نويسنده , , Luong N. and Hai، نويسنده , , Faisal I. and Kang، نويسنده , , Jinguo and Nghiem، نويسنده , , Long D. and Price، نويسنده , , William E. and Guo، نويسنده , , Wenshan and Ngo، نويسنده , , Huu H. and Tung، نويسنده , , Kuo-Lun، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
6
From page
412
To page
417
Abstract
The removal efficiency of 22 selected trace organic contaminants by sequential application of granular activated carbon (GAC) and simultaneous application of powdered activated carbon (PAC) with membrane bioreactor (MBR) was compared in this study. Both sequential application of GAC following MBR treatment (MBR–GAC) and simultaneous application of PAC within MBR (PAC–MBR) achieved improved removal (over 95%) of seven hydrophilic and biologically persistent compounds, which were less efficiently removed by MBR-only treatment (negligible to 70%). However, gradual breakthrough of these compounds occurred over an extended operation period. Charged compounds, particularly, fenoprop and diclofenac, demonstrated the fastest breakthrough (complete and 50–70%, in MBR–GAC and PAC–MBR, respectively). Based on a simple comparison from the long-term performance stability and activated carbon usage points of view, PAC–MBR appears to be a better option than MBR–GAC treatment.
Keywords
Powdered activated carbon , Granular activated carbon , trace organic contaminants , Membrane bioreactor
Journal title
Bioresource Technology
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Bioresource Technology
Record number
1931354
Link To Document