Title of article
Courtsʹ misplaced confidence in psychiatric diagnoses
Author/Authors
Mellsop، نويسنده , , Graham W. and Fraser، نويسنده , , Debra and Tapsell، نويسنده , , Rees and Menkes، نويسنده , , David B.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages
5
From page
331
To page
335
Abstract
In considering psychiatric evidence, criminal justice systems make considerable use of labels from official psychiatric classificatory systems. There are legislated requirements for psychological and/or behavioural phenomena to be addressed in legal tests, however medico-legal use of the current categorical diagnostic frameworks which are increasingly complex is difficult to justify. The lack of validity in large domains of the present classificatory systems is now more openly acknowledged, prompting a critical rethink. Illustrative examples include post-traumatic stress disorder, various personality disorders, and dissociative identity disorder. It follows that the Courtsʹ faith in the present categorical classifications (e.g., DSMIV and ICD10) is misplaced and may be ultimately unhelpful to the administration of justice.
Keywords
VALIDITY , Medico-legal , Psychiatric diagnoses
Journal title
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Serial Year
2011
Journal title
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Record number
1953003
Link To Document