• Title of article

    Courtsʹ misplaced confidence in psychiatric diagnoses

  • Author/Authors

    Mellsop، نويسنده , , Graham W. and Fraser، نويسنده , , Debra and Tapsell، نويسنده , , Rees and Menkes، نويسنده , , David B.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    331
  • To page
    335
  • Abstract
    In considering psychiatric evidence, criminal justice systems make considerable use of labels from official psychiatric classificatory systems. There are legislated requirements for psychological and/or behavioural phenomena to be addressed in legal tests, however medico-legal use of the current categorical diagnostic frameworks which are increasingly complex is difficult to justify. The lack of validity in large domains of the present classificatory systems is now more openly acknowledged, prompting a critical rethink. Illustrative examples include post-traumatic stress disorder, various personality disorders, and dissociative identity disorder. It follows that the Courtsʹ faith in the present categorical classifications (e.g., DSMIV and ICD10) is misplaced and may be ultimately unhelpful to the administration of justice.
  • Keywords
    VALIDITY , Medico-legal , Psychiatric diagnoses
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • Record number

    1953003