Title of article
Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites
Author/Authors
Effron، نويسنده , , Daniel A. and Cameron، نويسنده , , Jessica S. and Monin، نويسنده , , Benoît، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
4
From page
590
To page
593
Abstract
Three studies tested whether the opportunity to endorse Barack Obama made individuals subsequently more likely to favor Whites over Blacks. In Study 1, participants were more willing to describe a job as better suited for Whites than for Blacks after expressing support for Obama. Study 2 replicated this effect and ruled out alternative explanations: participants favored Whites for the job after endorsing Obama, but not after endorsing a White Democrat, nor after seeing Obama’s photo without having an opportunity to endorse him. Study 3 demonstrated that racial attitudes moderated this effect: endorsing Obama increased the amount of money allocated to an organization serving Whites at the expense of an organization serving Blacks only for participants high in a measure of racial prejudice. These three studies suggest that expressing support for Obama grants people moral credentials [Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43], thus reducing their concern with appearing prejudiced.
Keywords
licensing , Voting , political psychology , social norms , Moral credentials , racial attitudes
Journal title
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Record number
1958865
Link To Document