• Title of article

    Assessment of eco-labelling criteria development from a strategic sustainability perspective

  • Author/Authors

    Bratt، نويسنده , , Cecilia and Hallstedt، نويسنده , , Sophie and Robèrt، نويسنده , , K.-H. and Broman، نويسنده , , Gِran and Oldmark، نويسنده , , Jonas، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    1631
  • To page
    1638
  • Abstract
    To turn current patterns of consumption and production in a sustainable direction, solid and understandable market information on the socio-ecological performance of products is needed. Eco-labelling programmes have an important role in this communication. The aim of this study is to investigate what gaps there may be in the current criteria development processes in relation to a strategic sustainability perspective and develop recommendations on how such presumptive gaps could be bridged. First a previously published generic framework for strategic sustainable development is described and applied for the assessment of two eco-labelling programmes. Data for the assessment is collected from literature and in semi-structured interviews and discussions with eco-labelling experts. sessment revealed that the programmes lack both an operational definition of sustainability, and a statement of objectives to direct and drive the criteria development processes. Consequently they also lack guidelines for how product category criteria might gradually develop in any direction. The selected criteria mainly reflect the current reality based on a selection of negative impacts in ecosystems, but how this selection, or prioritization, is made is not clearly presented. Finally, there are no guidelines to ensure that the criteria developers represent a broad enough competence to embrace all essential sustainability aspects. clusion the results point at deficiencies in theory, process and practice of eco-labelling, which hampers cohesiveness, transparency and comprehension. And it hampers predictability, as producers get no support in foreseeing how coming revisions of criteria will develop. This represents a lost opportunity for strategic sustainable development. It is suggested that these problems could be avoided by informing the criteria development process by a framework for strategic sustainable development, based on backcasting from basic sustainability principles.
  • Keywords
    Sustainability , Framework for strategic sustainable development , Sustainable consumption and production , Eco-labelling
  • Journal title
    Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Record number

    1959019