Title of article
Accuracy of modification of diet for renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations as
Author/Authors
امامي اردكاني، عليرضا نويسنده بيمارستان دكتر شريعتي Emami-Ardakani, Alireza , فلاحي، بابك نويسنده موسسه تحقيقات پزشكي هسته اي-بيمارستان دكتر شريعتي-دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران Fallahi, B. , اميني، منوچهر نويسنده , , فرد اصفهاني، ارمغان نويسنده دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران,مركز تحقيقات پزشكي هسته اي، بيمارستان دكتر شريعي , , بيگي، داوود نويسنده Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Beiki, Davood , فرزانه فر، سعيد نويسنده Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Farzanefar, Saeed , عباسي ، مهرشاد نويسنده , , صادقيان، ليلا نويسنده , , افتخاري ، محمد 1329 نويسنده پزشکي , , ساغري ، محسن نويسنده Saghari, M
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 41 سال 2014
Pages
6
From page
23
To page
28
Abstract
Introduction: We intended to assess the accuracy of re-expressed Modification of Diet for Renal Disease (MDRD) and
Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in chronic kidney disease in two different
etiologies of acute renal failure (ARF): acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and acute glomerulonephritis (AGN).
Methods: Patients admitted for ARF or the patients complicated with ARF during the course of their hospitalization were
enrolled to the study (n=21; 14 females and 7 males; 11 ATN and 12 AGN). When the plasma creatinine reached a steady
state ( < 15% change in two consecutive days), GFR was measured with double plasma sample method (GFRDPSM) using
99mTc-DTPA. GFR was also estimated by MDRD (GFRMDRD) and CG (GFRCG) equations.
Results: The patients aged 44.8±19.5 years and weighted 67.8±10.7kg. GFRDPSM (32.9±14.7 ml/min) was statistically
different from the GFRMDRD (11.6±8.2 ml/min; p < 0.001) and CG-GFR (16.5±10ml/min; p < 0.001). The difference between
DPSM-GFR and MDRD-GFR was statistically significant in patients with either ATN (n=11; 31.9±15.0 vs.
11.7±10.3ml/min and p=0.001) or AGN (n=10; 34.1±15.1 vs. 11.4±5.6 ml/min and p=0.001); similarly the GFRCG was
lower than GFRDPSM in patients with either ATN (16.5±12.5ml/min and p < 0.01) or AGN (16.3±7.1ml/min and p < 0.005). No
statistically significant correlation was found between the GFRDPSM and GFRMDRD (r=0.34; p=0.13) but GFRDPSM and
GFRCG values were correlated (r=0.48; p=0.03). Out of subjects with GFRDPSM > 30, 92.3% had GFRMDRD < 30ml/min and
84.6% had GFRCG < 30ml/min.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that MDRD and CG equations were substantially inaccurate in patients with ARF. More
precise methods of GFR evaluation is recommended in these patients.
Journal title
Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Record number
2064929
Link To Document