Title of article
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of electrospun nanofibers of PCL, chitosan and gelatin: A comparative study
Author/Authors
Gomes، نويسنده , , S.R. and Rodrigues، نويسنده , , G. and Martins، نويسنده , , G.G. and Roberto، نويسنده , , M.A. and Mafra، نويسنده , , Sérgio M. and Henriques، نويسنده , , C.M.R. and Silva، نويسنده , , J.C.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Pages
11
From page
348
To page
358
Abstract
Many polymers have been investigated with respect to their use in skin tissue engineering. However, directly comparable data on the role played by different polymers in assisting skin wound healing requires their in vitro and in vivo evaluation under the same conditions. Therefore, we performed a study in order to compare the performance of electrospun nanofiber mats from three different polymers concerning cell–scaffold interaction and wound healing promotion. A polyester (polycaprolactone, PCL), a protein (gelatin from cold water fish skin, GEL) and a polysaccharide (chitosan, CS) were the polymers chosen. Gelatin nanofibers were crosslinked with glutaraldehyde vapor. The scaffolds were characterized physico-chemically, in vitro by seeding with human fetal fibroblasts, HFFF2, and used in vivo as skin substitutes in a rat wound model with total skin removal. In vitro tests revealed that cells adhered and proliferated in all scaffolds. However, cells deep into the scaffold were only observed in the PCL and CS scaffolds. In in vivo tests CS scaffolds had the highest impact on the healing process by decreasing the extent of wound contraction and enhancing the production of a neodermis and re-epithelialization of the wound.
Keywords
fibroblasts , Skin substitute , Wound healing , electrospinning , Polycaprolactone , Chitosan , Fish gelatin
Journal title
Materials Science and Engineering C
Serial Year
2015
Journal title
Materials Science and Engineering C
Record number
2105415
Link To Document