• Title of article

    Rice and resistant starch: different content depending on chosen methodology

  • Author/Authors

    Walter، نويسنده , , Melissa and da Silva، نويسنده , , Leila Picolli and Denardin، نويسنده , , Cristiane Casagrande، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    279
  • To page
    285
  • Abstract
    Resistant starch (RS), which is not digested in the small intestine, induces health benefits, as dietary fiber does. Hence, the precise measurement of RS fraction may contribute to identification of functional foods. RS can be measured by using different methodologies. However, current methodologies present some differences, making it difficult to evaluate obtained results. Moreover, parboiling may increase RS levels of rice. Therefore, in the present study, RS fraction of white rice (WR) and parboiled rice (PR) obtained using the AOAC method 996.11 were compared to that obtained using the method by Siljestrِm and Asp. Results showed that RS values obtained using the AOAC method were similar for WR and PR (4.2±0.7% vs. 4.0±0.2%). However, RS values obtained using the method by Siljestrِm and Asp were lower for WR when compared to PR (1.5±0.9% vs. 3.8±1.5%). Since parboiling reduced digestible starch fraction (73.9±6.5% vs. 82.4±4.2% for WR), it is reasonable to assume an increase in RS fraction. Thus, RS values obtained using the method by Siljestrِm and Asp seem more consistent than those obtained using the AOAC method. However, the cause of such discrepancies between the methods deserves further investigation, considering especially the nutritional significance.
  • Keywords
    White rice , Parboiled rice , Digestible starch
  • Journal title
    Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
  • Record number

    2167983