Title of article
Identifying and tracking key odorants from cattle feedlots
Author/Authors
Trabue، نويسنده , , Steven and Scoggin، نويسنده , , Kenwood and McConnell، نويسنده , , Laura and Maghirang، نويسنده , , Ronaldo and Razote، نويسنده , , Edna and Hatfield، نويسنده , , Jerry، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages
9
From page
4243
To page
4251
Abstract
Odors from cattle feedlots can negatively affect air quality in local communities. Our objectives were the following: 1) identify key odor-causing compounds using odor activity values (OAVs) and gas chromatography–olfactometry (GC–O) techniques; 2) compare odor threshold values from published databases; and 3) track the movement of odors from a cattle feedlot to receptor community. Odorous compounds emitted from a cattle feedlot were sampled on-site, 250 m downwind and 3.2 km downwind using both sorbent tubes and denuders. Sorbent tubes were analyzed by both GC–MS and GC–MS–O and key odorants determined using both OAV and GC-Surface Nasal Impact Frequency (SNIF) analysis, while denuders were analyzed by ion chromatography. Odorant concentrations had a diurnal pattern with peak concentrations during early morning and late evening periods. Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) were the most abundant of the major odorants. Odorants with concentrations above their odor threshold values at the feedlot included amines, VFAs, phenol compounds, and indole compounds. Key odorants at the feedlot were VFAs and phenol compounds, but their relative importance diminished with downwind distance. Indole compounds, while not the key odorants at the feedlot, increased in relative importance downwind of the feedlot. In general, the odorous compounds identified by GC-SNIF and OAV as having fecal/manure nature were similar. GC-SNIF was the more sensitive analytical technique; it identified several compounds that may have contributed to the unpleasantness of the cattle feedlot odor, but its throughput was extremely low thereby limiting its usefulness. There is a need to improve field sampling devices and odor threshold databases to enhance understanding and confidence in evaluating odors.
Keywords
CAFO , Air quality , Gas chromatography–olfactometry , VOC , Odor
Journal title
Atmospheric Environment
Serial Year
2011
Journal title
Atmospheric Environment
Record number
2237899
Link To Document