Reply to Comment on ‘Dykes, faults and paleostresses in the Teno and Anaga massifs of Tenerife (Canary Islands)’ by J.A. Rodrı́guez-Losada and A. Hernández-Pacheco

We welcome the comment by Rodrı́guez-Losada and Hernández-Pacheco (hereafter LP) and we are pleased that they have ‘no objections to the conclusions’ of Marinoni and Gudmundsson (2000; hereafter MG). The LP comment deals only with the Anaga massif and mostly with (1) dykes supposed to be folded by post-emplacement ductile deformation, (2) tilting of the oldest part of the Anaga succession, (3) selection of profiles, (4) the horizontal extension due to dykes, and (5) the paleostress field of Anaga. We reply briefly to these points below.