Title of article
Recovery vs. mass pull: The link to air recovery
Author/Authors
Hadler، نويسنده , , K. and Smith، نويسنده , , C.D. and Cilliers، نويسنده , , J.J.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages
9
From page
994
To page
1002
Abstract
In recent years, developments in control strategy for banks of flotation cells have included process control based on mass pull. Mass pull, or the flowrate of solids reporting to the concentrate, is affected by changes in froth structure and stability which are in turn affected by changes in operating parameters such as air flowrate and froth depth.
covery, or the fraction of air entering a cell that overflows the lip as unburst bubbles, is a robust, non-intrusive measure of froth stability that passes through a peak as cell air rate is increased. Furthermore, it has been shown that when operating a cell at the air rate that yields the ‘Peak Air Recovery’ (PAR), an improvement in flotation performance, particularly mineral recovery, can be obtained.
s paper, results from industrial experiments are reported that compare the effect of air rate on air recovery and flotation performance, and specifically the effect on mass pull and mineral recovery. The results show that an increase in mass pull does not necessarily yield an increased mineral recovery in all cases, since it is dependent on whether the air rate must be increased or decreased to obtain the ‘Peak Air Recovery’. This work shows the potential gain to be made from control using air recovery measurements and operating at PAR conditions.
Keywords
Flotation froths , Flotation bubbles , froth flotation , Process optimisation
Journal title
Minerals Engineering
Serial Year
2010
Journal title
Minerals Engineering
Record number
2271790
Link To Document