• Title of article

    Recovery vs. mass pull: The link to air recovery

  • Author/Authors

    Hadler، نويسنده , , K. and Smith، نويسنده , , C.D. and Cilliers، نويسنده , , J.J.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    994
  • To page
    1002
  • Abstract
    In recent years, developments in control strategy for banks of flotation cells have included process control based on mass pull. Mass pull, or the flowrate of solids reporting to the concentrate, is affected by changes in froth structure and stability which are in turn affected by changes in operating parameters such as air flowrate and froth depth. covery, or the fraction of air entering a cell that overflows the lip as unburst bubbles, is a robust, non-intrusive measure of froth stability that passes through a peak as cell air rate is increased. Furthermore, it has been shown that when operating a cell at the air rate that yields the ‘Peak Air Recovery’ (PAR), an improvement in flotation performance, particularly mineral recovery, can be obtained. s paper, results from industrial experiments are reported that compare the effect of air rate on air recovery and flotation performance, and specifically the effect on mass pull and mineral recovery. The results show that an increase in mass pull does not necessarily yield an increased mineral recovery in all cases, since it is dependent on whether the air rate must be increased or decreased to obtain the ‘Peak Air Recovery’. This work shows the potential gain to be made from control using air recovery measurements and operating at PAR conditions.
  • Keywords
    Flotation froths , Flotation bubbles , froth flotation , Process optimisation
  • Journal title
    Minerals Engineering
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Minerals Engineering
  • Record number

    2271790