• Title of article

    Why do doctored images distort memory?

  • Author/Authors

    Nash، نويسنده , , Robert A. and Wade، نويسنده , , Kimberley A. and Brewer، نويسنده , , Rebecca J.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    773
  • To page
    780
  • Abstract
    Doctored images can cause people to believe in and remember experiences that never occurred, yet the underlying mechanism(s) responsible are not well understood. How does compelling false evidence distort autobiographical memory? Subjects were filmed observing and copying a Research Assistant performing simple actions, then they returned 2 days later for a memory test. Before taking the test, subjects viewed video-clips of simple actions, including actions that they neither observed nor performed earlier. We varied the format of the video-clips between-subjects to tap into the source-monitoring mechanisms responsible for the ‘doctored-evidence effect.’ The distribution of belief and memory distortions across conditions suggests that at least two mechanisms are involved: doctored images create an illusion of familiarity, and also enhance the perceived credibility of false suggestions. These findings offer insight into how external evidence influences source-monitoring.
  • Keywords
    Metacognition , False memory , familiarity , Source monitoring , Autobiographical belief , Doctored images , Fabricated evidence
  • Journal title
    Consciousness and Cognition
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    Consciousness and Cognition
  • Record number

    2291375