• Title of article

    Neogene and Quaternary coexisting in the geological time scale: The inclusive compromise

  • Author/Authors

    McGowran، نويسنده , , Brian and Berggren، نويسنده , , Bill and Hilgen، نويسنده , , Frits and Steininger، نويسنده , , Fritz and Aubry، نويسنده , , Marie-Pierre and Lourens، نويسنده , , Lucas and Van Couvering، نويسنده , , John، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
  • Pages
    14
  • From page
    249
  • To page
    262
  • Abstract
    Removing the Tertiary and Quaternary Periods whilst conserving the Paleogene and Neogene Periods in The Geological Timescale 2004 caused a storm of protest. One response was to advocate restoring an enlarged Quaternary and consigning the Neogene to a minor role within the Tertiary. Amongst an array of practical, traditional, sentimental and anthropocentric reasons for this response, the one hard-core justification was that the rigidly nested hierarchy of the geological timescale must be preserved. ntral objective of this paper is conserving the historically legitimate, Miocene-present, Neogene Period and System. There are two options for conserving the Quaternary concurrently with the Neogene: (i) an inclusive compromise in a flexible hierarchy, and (ii) an upgrading of Pliocene and Pleistocene divisions to the level of epoch. inclusive compromise there coexist alternative pathways through the hierarchical ranks. Thus geohistorians and biohistorians have two options for traversing the hierarchy from era to age, as in this example using the hierarchical positioning of the Calabrian Age and Stage: Cenozoic [era]↔Neogene [period]↔Pleistocene [epoch]↔Calabrian [age], ozoic [era]↔Quaternary [subera]↔Pleistocene [epoch]↔Calabrian [age]. ffirm that the inclusive compromise is entirely viable. In so doing we (i) challenge the necessity of the rigidly nested hierarchy, which should be capable of a little flexibility; (ii) reject all analogies of the arbitrary and conventional chronostratigraphic hierarchy with three natural biological hierarchies; (iii) reaffirm the integrity of the Neogene extending to the present; and (iv) see no reason to doubt the harmonious coexistence of the two options preserving the Quaternary and Neogene traditions in an orderly working and stable time scale. alternative schema conserving the Neogene, divisions of the Pliocene and Pleistocene are upgraded, so that the Late Pleistocene, Early Pleistocene and Late Pliocene Epochs comprise the Quaternary Subperiod, itself equivalent to Late Neogene. The inflexibly nested hierarchy is preserved but the Tertiary is lost.
  • Keywords
    Cenozoic , Neogene , Quaternary , chronostratigraphic classification , Hierarchy
  • Journal title
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
  • Record number

    2336022