• Title of article

    A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties

  • Author/Authors

    Li، نويسنده , , Dian-Qing and Jiang، نويسنده , , Shui-Hua and Cao، نويسنده , , Zijun and Zhou، نويسنده , , Wei and Zhou، نويسنده , , Chuang-Bing and Zhang، نويسنده , , Li-Min، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
  • Pages
    13
  • From page
    60
  • To page
    72
  • Abstract
    This paper proposes a multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable soil properties. The scales of fluctuation of soil shear strength parameters are summarized. The effect of theoretical autocorrelation functions (ACFs) on slope reliability is highlighted since the theoretical ACFs are often used to characterize the spatial variability of soil properties due to a limited number of site observation data available. The differences in five theoretical ACFs, namely single exponential, squared exponential, second-order Markov, cosine exponential and binary noise ACFs, are examined. A homogeneous c–ϕ slope and a heterogeneous slope consisting of three soil layers (including a weak layer) are studied to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method and explore the effect of ACFs on the slope reliability. The results indicate that the proposed method provides a practical tool for evaluating the reliability of slopes in spatially variable soils. It can greatly improve the computational efficiency in relatively low-probability analysis and parametric sensitivity analysis. The extended Cholesky decomposition technique can effectively discretize the cross-correlated non-Gaussian random fields of spatially variable soil properties. Among the five selected ACFs, the squared exponential and second-order Markov ACFs might characterize the spatial correlation of soil properties more realistically. The probability of failure associated with the commonly-used single exponential ACF may be underestimated. In general, the difference in the probabilities of failure associated with the five ACFs is minimal.
  • Keywords
    Slopes , reliability analysis , Spatial variability , Random field , Autocorrelation function , Response Surface
  • Journal title
    Engineering Geology
  • Serial Year
    2015
  • Journal title
    Engineering Geology
  • Record number

    2342982