• Title of article

    Input Processing and Processing Instruction: Definitions and Issues

  • Author/Authors

    Hashemnezhad، Hossein نويسنده Department of Foreign Languages and Literature,Isalamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch,Tabriz,Iran , , Khalili Zangalani، Sanaz نويسنده Department of Foreign Languages and Literature,Isalamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch,Tabriz,Iran ,

  • Issue Information
    دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    23
  • To page
    27
  • Abstract
    Input Processing (IP) proposed by VanPatten (1993), was innovated based on Krashen’s (1982) input hypothesis. In IP model, principles are stated that describe how learners either miss grammatical markers in the input or how they get them wrong (VanPatten, 2002b). Based on this model, learners process input for meaning before form. Processing Instruction (PI), an explicit focus on form that is informed by the model of IP, is a practical solution to IP model. The goal of PI is to help L2 learners derive richer intake from input by having them engage in structured input activities that push them away from the strategies they normally use to make formmeaning connections (Wong, 2004). This article intends to study  the definitions of IP and PI as well the issues of IP and PI, including the principles of IP,  features and goal of PI, and input used in PI (Structured input activities), and then to introduce difference between the terms IP and PI.
  • Keywords
    Structured Input activities , Input processing , Processing Instruction
  • Journal title
    International Journal Of Applied Linguistics And English Literature
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    International Journal Of Applied Linguistics And English Literature
  • Record number

    2404044