Title of article
Input Processing and Processing Instruction: Definitions and Issues
Author/Authors
Hashemnezhad، Hossein نويسنده Department of Foreign Languages and Literature,Isalamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch,Tabriz,Iran , , Khalili Zangalani، Sanaz نويسنده Department of Foreign Languages and Literature,Isalamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch,Tabriz,Iran ,
Issue Information
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
5
From page
23
To page
27
Abstract
Input Processing (IP) proposed by VanPatten (1993), was innovated based on Krashen’s (1982) input hypothesis. In IP model, principles are stated that describe how learners either miss grammatical markers in the input or how they get them wrong (VanPatten, 2002b). Based on this model, learners process input for meaning before form. Processing Instruction (PI), an explicit focus on form that is informed by the model of IP, is a practical solution to IP model. The goal of PI is to help L2 learners derive richer intake from input by having them engage in structured input activities that push them away from the strategies they normally use to make formmeaning connections (Wong, 2004). This article intends to study the definitions of IP and PI as well the issues of IP and PI, including the principles of IP, features and goal of PI, and input used in PI (Structured input activities), and then to introduce difference between the terms IP and PI.
Keywords
Structured Input activities , Input processing , Processing Instruction
Journal title
International Journal Of Applied Linguistics And English Literature
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
International Journal Of Applied Linguistics And English Literature
Record number
2404044
Link To Document