Title of article
Clinical Polymorphism of Stargardt Disease in a Large Consanguineous Tunisian Family; Implications for Nosology
Author/Authors
El Matri, Leila Department of Ophthalmology - Hedi Rais Institute of Ophthalmology, Tunis, Tunisia , Chebil, Ahmed Department of Ophthalmology - Hedi Rais Institute of Ophthalmology, Tunis, Tunisia , Largueche, Leila Department of Ophthalmology - Hedi Rais Institute of Ophthalmology, Tunis, Tunisia , Ouechtati, Farah Ocular Genetics Research Unit (UR17/04) - Hedi Rais Institute of Ophthalmology, Tunis, Tunisia , Abdelhak, Sonia Molecular Investigation of Genetic Orphan Diseases Unit - Institut Pasteur, Tunis, Tunisia
Pages
10
From page
341
To page
350
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the polymorphic expression of Stargardt disease in a large Tunisian
family with clinical intra- and interfamilial variation of the condition.
Methods: Twelve subjects from two related families with autosomal recessive Stargardt
disease were enrolled. A detailed clinical examination including visual acuity and visual
field measurement, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, electroretinography
(ERG) and color vision testing was performed for all subjects.
Results: The youngest child from family A manifested typical Stargardt disease while
her two brothers presented with Stargardt disease-fundus flavimaculatus (STGD-FFM)
and her two sisters demonstrated a peculiar phenotype overlapping Stargardt disease
and cone-rod dystrophy; their phenotypic manifestation corresponded well with
ERG groups I, II and III, respectively. This uncommon occurrence of an age-related
decline in ERG amplitude and worsening of fundus changes is suggestive of a grading
pattern in Stargardt disease. Their two cousins in family B, displayed the STGD-FFM
phenotype. Despite clinically similar STGD-FFM patterns in both families, age of onset
and progression of the phenotype in family B differed from family A.
Conclusion: This is the first report on phenotypic variation of Stargardt disease in a
large Tunisian family. Regarding phenotype and severity of visual symptoms, family
A demonstrated Stargardt disease at various stages of progression. In addition, STGDFFM
appeared to be an independent clinical entity in family B. These findings imply
that further parameters are required to classify Stargardt’s disease.
Keywords
Stargardt Disease , Fundus Flavimaculatus , Intrafamilial , Interfamilial , Progression , Classification , Prognosis
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2013
Record number
2416248
Link To Document