• Title of article

    Preventing Unnecessary Invasive Cancer-Diagnostic Tests: Changing the Cut-off Points

  • Author/Authors

    Pourmand, G Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mehrsai, AR Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Nikoobakht, MR Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Allameh, F Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Hossieni, SH Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Seraji, A Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Haidari, F Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Dehghani, S Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Razmandeh, R Urology Research Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Ramezani, R CDC Cancer Office - Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran , Sabahgoulian,B Bistoon Ultrasound Clinic, Tehran , Rezai, M Bistoon Ultrasound Clinic, Tehran , Nadali, F Dept. of Hematology - Allied Health Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Pourmand, B Research Development Center - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    47
  • To page
    52
  • Abstract
    Background: To determine a cut-off point of tPSA and PSAD to prevent unnecessary invasive cancer-diagnosing tests in the community. Methods: This study was performed on 688 consecutive patients referred to our center due to prostatism, suspicious lesions on digital rectal examination and/or elevated serum PSA levels. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies and obtained PSAD. Serum levels of tPSA and fPSA were measured by chemiluminescence. Comparisons were done using tests of accuracy (AUC-ROC). Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 334 patients, whereas the other 354 patients were suffering from benign prostate diseases. The mean tPSA in case and control groups were 28.32±63.62 ng/ml and 7.14±10.04 ng/ml; the mean f/tPSA ratios were 0.13± 0.21 and 0.26±0.24 in PCa and benign prostate disease groups; the mean PSAD rates were 0.69±2.24, 0.12±0.11, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found (P <0.05). Using ROC curve analysis, it was revealed that AUC was 0.78 for tPSA and 0.80 for f/tPSA. Sensitivity was 71% for the cut-off value of 7.85ng/ml. For f/tPSA ratio, the optimal cut-off value was 0.13 which produced the sensitivity of 81.4% and for PSAD, it was15%. Conclusions: As this trial is different from the European and American values, we should be more cautious in dealing with the prostate cancer upon the obtained sensitivity and specificity for PCa diagnosis (7.85ng/mLfor tPSA, 15% for PSAD and 0.13 for f/tPSA ratio).
  • Keywords
    Cut-off Point , Prostate cancer , PSAD , tPSA , PCa diagnosis
  • Journal title
    Astroparticle Physics
  • Serial Year
    2012
  • Record number

    2440647