Title of article
Clinical efficacy and tolerability of valacyclovir versus acyclovir in treatment of herpes zoster
Author/Authors
Achar, Arun Department of Dermatology - Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore , Chakraborty, Partha Pratim Department of Medicine - Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore , Ghosh, Tarapada Department of Pediatrics - Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore , Naskar, Biswanath Department of Dermatology - Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore , Guharay, Tapobrata Department of Community Medicine - Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore , Bisai, Samiran Department of Anthropology - North Eastern Hill University - Shillong and Department of Anthropology - Vidyasagar University, Midnapore
Pages
6
From page
52
To page
57
Abstract
Background: Acyclovir, a specific and selective inhibitor of
replication of herpesviridae family, has well documented efficacy
for speedy rash healing and decreasing pain of herpes zoster.
Limited oral bioavailability of acyclovir requires frequent dosing.
Valacyclovir is rapidly and almost completely converted to
acyclovir in vivo and gives three to fivefold increase in acyclovir
bioavailability. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical
efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral valacyclovir versus standard
oral acyclovir in the treatment of herpes zoster.
Methods: A blind randomized prospective study was performed
during May 2007 to August 2007 in Midnapore Medical College.
Immunocompetent patients, aged ≥40yrs presenting with herpes
zoster within 72 hours after onset of rash were enrolled and
randomized to receive one of the following treatments: 1000
mg of valacyclovir thrice daily for 7 days or acyclovir 800 mg 5
times daily for 7 days. A total of 60 patients were included and
randomized to receive either valacyclovir (n=30) or acyclovir
(n=30) and they were evaluated at 8 days, 15 days and 29 days,
respectively.
Results: A statistically significant reduction of skin lesion and
zoster associated pain were noticed in valacyclovir compared to
acyclovir group. However, presence of post herpetic neuralgia
on the 29th day was less in acyclovir compared to valacyclovir
group (70.0% vs. 83.3%, P>0.05). Only one patient on valacyclovir
and two patients on acyclovir complained of nausea and mild
abdominal pain.
Conclusion: We conclude that for the management of herpes
zoster, valacyclovir might be superior to acyclovir in respect to
reduction of skin lesions and pain.
Keywords
acyclovir , herpes zoster , treatment , valacyclovir
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2011
Record number
2479869
Link To Document