• Title of article

    Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of non-precious alloy‒ceramic interface: An SEM study

  • Author/Authors

    Belkhode, Vikram M Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge - Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital Sawangi, Wardha , Nimonkar, Sharayu V Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge - Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital Sawangi, Wardha , Godbole, S.R Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge - Professor Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital Sawangi, Wardha , Nimonkar, Pranali Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Asst. Professor Government Medical Hospital, Nagpur , Sathe, Seema Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge - Professor Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital Sawangi, Wardha , Borle, Anjali Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge - Professor Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital Sawangi, Wardha

  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    200
  • To page
    207
  • Abstract
    Background. Dental porcelain has excellent esthetics in combination with biocompatibility and is one of the most commonly used restorative materials. Its low tensile strength remains a major drawback. The porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations have been introduced to increase the fracture resistance of dental porcelain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a non-precious alloy to ceramic. Methods. The present cross-sectional observational study was conducted with forty samples of cobalt‒chromium that were fabricated with porcelain interposed between the two metal test pieces. The metal was subjected to combinations of different surface treatments. The samples group A (n=10) were not subjected to any surface treatments. Group B samples underwent sandblasting and surface grinding. Group C samples were subjected to sandblasting, surface grinding and degassing; and group D samples underwent sandblasting, surface grinding, ultrasonic cleaning and degassing. The tensile bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to obtain images of the samples after surface treatment to determine the surface irregularities and after the debonding of the samples for the type of the bond failure. ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis.
  • Keywords
    ultrasonic cleaning , surface grinding , scanning electron microscope , sandblasting , metal ceramic restorations , degassing , Bond failure
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
  • Serial Year
    2019
  • Record number

    2501424