Title of article
Is the Etiology Behind Palatal Unilateral and Palatal Bilateral Maxillary Canine Ectopia Different?
Author/Authors
Shirazi, Zahra University of Copenhagen - Institute of Odontology, Denmark , Kjær, Inger University of Copenhagen - Institute of Odontology, Denmark
Pages
13
From page
3
To page
15
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether dentitions and craniofacial profiles are different in unilateral and bilateral
maxillary canine ectopia. Materials and Methods: Radiographic materials from 75 patients with non-syndromic palatally displaced
maxillary canines were studied. Bilateral ectopia occurred in 37 patients and unilateral ectopia in 38 patients. Orthopantomograms were
analyzed for dental deviation including taurodontic morphology, abnormal crown morphology, invaginations of the incisors and short root
lengths. Skeletal morphology was studied cephalometrically according to Björk. Statistic analysis were included. Results: Significant more
females than males had palatally ectopic maxillary canines. Gender differences were not observed between the uni- and bilateral ectopia
groups. Orthopantomograms: the occurrence of taurodontia was significantly higher in the bilateral group while invaginations were
significantly higher in the unilateral group. Patients with palatally displaced maxillary canines had an increased occurrence of agenesis.
Profile radiographs: in the unilateral group significantly retroclined maxillary incisors in females and males and a significantly posterior
inclined maxilla in females occurred. In the bilateral group a significantly reduced slope of the maxillary incisors was demonstrated.
Compared to the individuals without palatally displaced maxillary canines, the maxillary incisors were significantly retroclined in both groups.
Conclusion: The present paper indicates a difference in the dentition and craniofacial profile in palatal unilateral and palatal bilateral
maxillary canine ectopia. It is presumed that the unilaterally displaced canines have a dental origin while the bilateral cases have a skeletal
origin. If this is so, the diagnosis of the dental morphology (invagination and taurodontia) might help to distinguish between cases with dental
etiology and cases with skeletal etiology. This distinguish may improve orthodontic treatment.
Keywords
Canine , cefalometry , ectopia , human , orthpantomogram , profile radiographs
Journal title
Dental Hypotheses
Serial Year
2018
Record number
2533723
Link To Document