Title of article
Comparison of Peritonsillar Infiltration of Lidocaine and Bupivacaine for Management of Postoperative Pain of Tonsillectomy
Author/Authors
Peyvandi, Aliasghar Hearing Disorders Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Ahmady Roozbahany, Navid Hearing Disorders Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Niknazar, Somayeh Hearing Disorders Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Hosseinrezai Mahani, Mozhgan Hearing Disorders Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran
Pages
6
From page
37
To page
42
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pain following tonsillectomy is a common problem of this surgical procedure.
Purpose: To compare the effects of preincisional peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine and bupivacaine on post tonsillectomy pain in patients older than 8 years old.
Methods: A double blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. The patients randomly allocated into three groups. Peritonsillar infiltrations with bupivacaine, lidocaine and normal saline were applied in group 1 2 and 3respectively. In 5th, 10th and 20th postoperative hours, the severity of pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: The patients in the bupivacaine group experienced a significantly milder pain in all postoperative hours comparing with the other groups. This effect was more obvious in male sex. The difference in pain sensation between lidocaine and saline groups was not significant.
Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of bupivacaine decreases pain in the first post-operative day after tonsillectomy whereas lidocaine does not show a similar effect.
Keywords
Pain , Postoperative , Tonsillectomy , Bupivacaine , Lidocaine
Journal title
Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
Serial Year
2016
Record number
2727436
Link To Document