• Title of article

    Statin Type and Cancer Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Type 2 and Solid Tumors

  • Author/Authors

    Ceacareanu, Alice C. Translational Biomedical Research Management Graduate Program - Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York, USA , Jolly, Shanria D. Translational Biomedical Research Management Graduate Program - Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York, USA , Nimako, George K. Department of Pharmacy Practice - School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences - State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA , Wintrob, Zachary A. P. Translational Biomedical Research Management Graduate Program - Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York, USA

  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    50
  • To page
    56
  • Abstract
    Objective: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects 10% of Americans and is associated with an increased incidence of cancer. Statins are first‑line cholesterol-lowering medications in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between statin use and reduced cancer incidence. We examined the cancer benefits of statin subtypes, with specific attention to disease‑free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: This retrospective review included adults with T2DM diagnosed with solid tumors at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY, USA (2003–2010). Individuals with gestational diabetes, incomplete records, or diagnosed with rare solid tumors were excluded. Follow-up began at the date of diagnosis and ended with the first confirmed recurrence, death, or loss of contact. Demographics were assessed by Chi-square, Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional hazards regression. Findings: Overall, 1102 patients met inclusion criteria, 52.1% of the study participants were female, and 578 participants (52.5%) died during the follow-up period which ranged from 0 to 156 months. Hydrophilic statin use was associated with improved DFS at 5-year follow-up (41.0% vs. 36.9%, P = 0.0077) compared to lipophilic statin use. Multivariate regression revealed that hydrophilic statins were associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.706, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.526–0.947) and OS (HR: 0.685, 95% CI: 0.503–0.934). Pravastatin was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.674, 95% CI: 0.471–0.964). Conclusion: In patients with T2DM and cancer, hydrophilic statins, and pravastatin in particular, are associated with improved DFS as well as OS. Further research examining the cancer‑specific effects of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins is needed to better understand their beneficial effects
  • Keywords
    pravastatin , lipophilic statins , hydrophilic statins , Cancer mortality , cancer recurrence , diabetes mellitus
  • Journal title
    Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
  • Serial Year
    2021
  • Record number

    2729733