Title of article
Is Clarivate’s Web of Science Still Unable to Identify Review Papers Correctly? Evidence, Implications, and Potential Solutions
Author/Authors
Moussa ، Salim Institut Supérieur des Études Appliquées en Humanités - Marketting University of Gafsa
From page
351
To page
362
Abstract
This paper presents a study of 97 papers classified as review papers by Clarivate’s Web of Science. The 97 peer-reviewed papers were published in three prestigious information and library science journals. According to the findings, 57 of the 97 alleged reviews are genuine. 37 research articles, brief communication, case studies, and film reviews are among the 40 papers mislabeled as reviews. The author identifies the causes of these misclassifications, discusses the implications of these misclassifications, and suggests potential solutions to avoid them.
Keywords
Web of Science , misclassification , review papers
Journal title
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Journal title
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Record number
2746598
Link To Document