• Title of article

    Comparison of a static gravity screen-roll press combination separator to a PAM-assisted gravity belt thickener system for swine waste slurry solids separation

  • Author/Authors

    Paul Walker، نويسنده , , Tim Kelley، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    571
  • To page
    576
  • Abstract
    Liquid effluent resulting from solids separation from raw swine slurry (RS) using a static gravity screen-roll press separator (SE) and a polyacrylamide (PAM) flocculant-assisted gravity belt thickener system (BE1 and 2, with BE2 designating an added belt thickening of SE) were compared. Effluent pH was 7.6–7.7. Dissolved oxygen was less than 0.01 mg/l in RS and SE and 0.50 mg/l in BE1 and 2. Solids dry weight and total phosphorus concentrations were reduced significantly (p 0.05) in SE (17–27%) and in BE1 and 2 (92–96%), relative to RS. Phosphorus concentration reductions were higher than those previously found. Settleable and suspended solids, total nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand were significantly reduced in BE1 and 2 (63–99%). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between BE1 and 2. Results indicated that the gravity belt thickener system was more efficient at solids separation than the screen-roll press system.
  • Keywords
    Screen-roll press , Raw swine slurry , Solids separation , Belt thickener , Polyacrylamide (PAM)
  • Journal title
    Bioresource Technology
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    Bioresource Technology
  • Record number

    411828