Knee movement strategies differentiate expert from novice workers in asymmetrical manual materials handling

One way to generate hypotheses on appropriate handling principles is to compare the strategies of highly skilled workers (experts) with those of novice workers (novices). This study was conducted to determine whether experts differ from novices in their handling strategies and to determine the effects of these differences in joint motions and net reaction moments at the trunk (L5/S1) and knees. Six experts and five novices were compared transferring two loads (12 and 22 kg) from four different initial low positions to a standardized low position on a trolley. The external forces were obtained from two AMTI force platforms, and two 16 mm Locam cameras coupled with two mirrors were used to obtain the three-dimensional kinematic data. An inverse dynamic analysis was performed on each segment and the net reaction moments were evaluated at L5/S1 and the knees; trunk posture, knee flexion angles and feet spacings were also calculated. Results showed that both groups minimized trunk asymmetries of posture and efforts; however, the experts were characterized by reduced knee flexion (31° vs 53°) and total knee excursion (20° vs 38°), increased flexion moments (72 vs 58 Nm) but reduced extension moments (4 vs 26 Nm) and valgus moments (30 vs 54 Nm). The expertsʹ strategies appear safer overall because they reduce trunk asymmetry, asymmetrical efforts on the knee and stress on the femoropatellar joint. Moreover, these strategies present a potential for reduced mechanical energy expenditure due to lower knee excursions and increased knee stability due to reduced knee flexion.