Title of article
A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Relative Protection Against Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Microvascular Dysfunction, Ischemia, and Inflammation Among Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Agents: The PROTECT–TIMI-30 Trial Original Research Article
Author/Authors
C. Michael Gibson، نويسنده , , David A. Morrow، نويسنده , , Sabina A. Murphy، نويسنده , , Theresa M. Palabrica، نويسنده , , Lisa K. Jennings، نويسنده , , Peter H. Stone، نويسنده , , Henry H. Lui، نويسنده , , Thomas Bulle، نويسنده , , Nasser Lakkis، نويسنده , , Richard Kovach، نويسنده , , David J. Cohen، نويسنده , , Polly Fish، نويسنده , , Carolyn H. McCabe*، نويسنده , , Eugene Braunwald and TIMI Study Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
10
From page
2364
To page
2373
Abstract
Objectives
The goal of this study was to evaluate glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide when administered with indirect thrombin inhibition as compared with monotherapy with direct thrombin inhibition with bivalirudin among patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Background
The optimal combination of antiplatelet and antithrombin regimens that maximizes efficacy and minimizes bleeding among patients with non–ST-segment elevation ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.
Methods
A total of 857 patients with non–ST-segment elevation ACS were assigned randomly to eptifibatide + reduced dose unfractionated heparin (n = 298), eptifibatide + reduced-dose enoxaparin (n = 275), or bivalirudin monotherapy (n = 284).
Results
Among angiographically evaluable patients (n = 754), the primary end point of post-PCI coronary flow reserve was significantly greater with bivalirudin (1.43 vs. 1.33 for pooled eptifibatide arms, p = 0.036). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grade more often was normal with eptifibatide treatment compared with bivalirudin (57.9% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.048). The duration of ischemia on continuous Holter monitoring after PCI was significantly longer among patients treated with bivalirudin (169 vs. 36 min, p = 0.013). There was no excess of TIMI major bleeding among patients treated with eptifibatide compared with bivalirudin (0.7%, n = 4 vs. 0%, p = NS), but TIMI minor bleeding was increased (2.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.027) as was transfusion (4.4% to 0.4%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Among moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS undergoing PCI, coronary flow reserve was greater with bivalirudin than eptifibatide. Eptifibatide improved myocardial perfusion and reduced the duration of post-PCI ischemia but was associated with higher minor bleeding and transfusion rates. Ischemic events and biomarkers for myonecrosis, inflammation, and thrombin generation did not differ between agents.
Keywords
ACT , myocardial infarction , Interleukin , PCI , CK-MB , intravenous , Glycoprotein , MI , Percutaneous coronary intervention , GP , IV , TIMI , Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction , NSTEMI , activated clotting time , IL , cTfc , corrected TIMI frame count , TMPG , UFH , unfractionated heparin , creatine kinase-myocardial band , TIMI myocardial perfusion grade , non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
471809
Link To Document