Title of article
Long-Term Prognosis Associated With Coronary Calcification: Observations From a Registry of 25,253 Patients Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Matthew J. Budoff، نويسنده , , Leslee J. Shaw، نويسنده , , Sandy T. Liu، نويسنده , , Steven R. Weinstein، نويسنده , , Tristen P. Mosler، نويسنده , , Philip H. Tseng، نويسنده , , Ferdinand R. Flores، نويسنده , , Tracy Q. Callister، نويسنده , , Paolo Raggi، نويسنده , , Daniel S. Berman، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
11
From page
1860
To page
1870
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to develop risk-adjusted multivariable models that include risk factors and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores measured with electron-beam tomography in asymptomatic patients for the prediction of all-cause mortality.
Background
Several smaller studies have documented the efficacy of CAC testing for assessment of cardiovascular risk. Larger studies with longer follow-up will lend strength to the hypothesis that CAC testing will improve outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and safety of primary prevention efforts.
Methods
We used an observational outcome study of a cohort of 25,253 consecutive, asymptomatic individuals referred by their primary physician for CAC scanning to assess cardiovascular risk. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed to predict all-cause mortality. Risk-adjusted models incorporated traditional risk factors for coronary disease and CAC scores.
Results
The frequency of CAC scores was 44%, 14%, 20%, 13%, 6%, and 4% for scores of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 100, 101 to 400, 401 to 1,000, and >1,000, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 6.8 ± 3 years, the death rate was 2% (510 deaths). The CAC was an independent predictor of mortality in a multivariable model controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and cardiac risk factors (model chi-square = 2,017, p < 0.0001). The addition of CAC to traditional risk factors increased the concordance index significantly (0.61 for risk factors vs. 0.81 for the CAC score, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted relative risk ratios for CAC were 2.2-, 4.5-, 6.4-, 9.2-, 10.4-, and 12.5-fold for scores of 11 to 100, 101 to 299, 300 to 399, 400 to 699, 700 to 999, and >1,000, respectively (p < 0.0001), when compared with a score of 0. Ten-year survival (after adjustment for risk factors, including age) was 99.4% for a CAC score of 0 and worsened to 87.8% for a score of >1,000 (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
This large observational data series shows that CAC provides independent incremental information in addition to traditional risk factors in the prediction of all-cause mortality.
Keywords
CAD , coronary heart disease , coronary artery disease , ROC , Risk ratio , Confidence interval , CAC , CI , RR , CHD , EBT , electron beam tomography , coronary artery calcium , receiver-operating characteristic
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
472530
Link To Document