Title of article
Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Stem Coronary Artery Stenosis: Stenting or Surgery Review Article
Author/Authors
David P. Taggart، نويسنده , , Sanjay Kaul، نويسنده , , William E. Boden، نويسنده , , T. Bruce Ferguson Jr، نويسنده , , Robert A. Guyton، نويسنده , , Michael J. Mack، نويسنده , , Paul T. Sergeant، نويسنده , , Richard J. Shemin، نويسنده , , Peter K. Smith، نويسنده , , Salim Yusuf، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
8
From page
885
To page
892
Abstract
For coronary artery disease with unprotected left main stem (LMS) stenosis, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is traditionally regarded as the “standard of care” because of its well-documented and durable survival advantage. There is now an increasing trend to use drug-eluting stents for LMS stenosis rather than CABG despite very little high-quality data to inform clinical practice. We herein: 1) evaluate the current evidence in support of the use of percutaneous revascularization for unprotected LMS; 2) assess the underlying justification for randomized controlled trials of stenting versus surgery for unprotected LMS; and 3) examine the optimum approach to informed consent. We conclude that CABG should indeed remain the preferred revascularization treatment in good surgical candidates with unprotected LMS stenosis.
Keywords
CAD , PCI , coronary artery disease , DES , Randomized controlled trial , mace , LMS , RCT , Percutaneous coronary intervention , CABG , ACC/AHA , American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association , coronary artery bypass grafting , drug-eluting stent(s) , IMA , internal mammary artery , BMS , major adverse coronary events , left main stem , bare-metal stent(s)
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
473142
Link To Document