Title of article
Routine follow-up after periradicular operations: current practice in UK hospitals
Author/Authors
R. J. Oliver، نويسنده , , K. Mavrakis، نويسنده , , T. MacFarlane، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages
3
From page
52
To page
54
Abstract
Questionnaires were circulated to all Fellows of the British Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in 1999, 75% of whom replied (n = 194). There was a wide range of responses for both the timing of review appointments and the taking of radiographs. Most patients were first followed up 1 week after operation (46%), but 38% were reviewed in the second week. Five surgeons did not review patients at all and two did not review until 6 or 9 months, respectively. Nearly two-thirds routinely offered a second follow-up appointment but only 14% offered more than two, the maximum being seven. Most arranged postoperative radio-graphs but the timing ranged from immediately postoperatively to 1 year after the procedure. Less than one-third requested a second postoperative radiograph between 1 month and 1 year. The largest disparity was in the time of discharge to the general dental practitioner, which ranged from immediately to 5 years, the most popular time of discharge being at 3 months. The wide variations may reflect unnecessary recall of patients and misuse of valuable clinical time.
Journal title
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
Serial Year
2002
Journal title
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
Record number
492780
Link To Document