Title of article
Validation and comparison of two computerized methodsof obtaining a diet history
Author/Authors
J. Landig، نويسنده , , J.G. Erhardt، نويسنده , , J.C. Bode، نويسنده , , C. Bode، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages
5
From page
113
To page
117
Abstract
The aim of this study was to validate two computerized methods of obtaining a diet history(DH and EBIS). The food consumption of 12 men and eight women was calculated by weighing each food item over a period of 8 days. Thereafter the diet history was taken over this period by using both programs alternatively. The intake of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates, and 10 further nutrients was evaluated and the percentage difference calculated. In general, the intake of nutrients calculated from the diet history tended to be underestimated by most of the people interviewed. The mean daily intake of the nutrients calculated from the DH program deviates from −34% to +20% (mean SD = 48.1) and −35% to +15% for EBIS (mean SD = 28.1). In conclusion, both computerized methods proved useful for epidemiological studies, but not for the determination of deficiencies in individuals.
Keywords
food intake , computerassisted questionnaire , validation , dietary assessment
Journal title
Clinical Nutrition
Serial Year
1998
Journal title
Clinical Nutrition
Record number
504245
Link To Document