• Title of article

    Comparison of monophasic versus biphasic stimulation in rTMS over premotor cortex: SEP and SPECT studies

  • Author/Authors

    Yuki Hosono، نويسنده , , Ryo Urushihara، نويسنده , , Masafumi Harada، نويسنده , , Naomi Morita، نويسنده , , Nagako Murase، نويسنده , , Yamato Kunikane، نويسنده , , Hideki Shimazu، نويسنده , , Kotaro Asanuma، نويسنده , , Haruo Uguisu، نويسنده , , Ryuji Kaji، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    2538
  • To page
    2545
  • Abstract
    Objective To optimize the clinical uses of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we compared the effects of rTMS on somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using different phases (monophasic vs. biphasic) or frequencies (0.2 Hz vs. 0.8 Hz) of stimulation. Methods In the first experiment, different phases were compared (0.2 Hz monophasic vs. 0.2 Hz biphasic). Biphasic 1 Hz or sham condition served as controls. The second experiment was to explore the effect of frequencies (0.2 Hz vs. 0.8 Hz) using the monophasic stimulation. Substhreshold TMS was applied 250 times over the left premotor cortex. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed before and after monophasic 0.2 Hz or biphasic 1 Hz rTMS. Results Monophasic rTMS of both 0.2 and 0.8 Hz significantly increased the ratio of N30 amplitudes as compared with sham rTMS, whereas biphasic stimulation showed no significant effects. SPECT showed increased rCBF in motor cortices after monophasic 0.2 Hz rTMS, but not after biphasic 1 Hz stimulation. Conclusions Monophasic rTMS exerted more profound effects on SEPs and rCBF than biphasic rTMS over the premotor cortex. Significance Monophasic rTMS over the premotor cortex could be clinically more useful than biphasic rTMS.
  • Keywords
    Somatosensory-evoked potentialRepetitive transcranial magneticstimulationMonophasicBiphasic
  • Journal title
    Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Record number

    524894