Importance of Calcium for the Vulnerability to Ventricular Fibrillation Detected by Premature Ventricular Stimulation: Single Pulse Versus Sequential Pulse Methods

Vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation (VF) is frequently evaluated by VF threshold, a variable which may not be free of confounding factors and which may not be sensitive to all factors contributing to vulnerability. Therefore, we tested whether VF threshold determination affects intracellular free Ca2+([Ca2+]i) and whether VF thresholds are sensitive to changes in [Ca2+]i. For this purpose, we analysed [Ca2+]iby surface fluorometry and indo-1 in intact perfused rat hearts undergoing VF threshold determination by a single pulse method and tested whether such thresholds are lowered by increased [Ca2+]i. Additionally, we sought to determine the importance of Ca2+for the vulnerability to VF under nonischemic conditions. For this purpose, we measured VF thresholds by a new pulse number method which scanned the vulnerable period by an increasing number of sequential pulses at increasing prematurity but constant intensity. We found that VF threshold determination by a single pulse method led to a rise in systolic [Ca2+]i. However, this rise does not perturb VF threshold interpretation because such thresholds were insensitive to changes in [Ca2+]i. Nevertheless, [Ca2+]iis of importance for the vulnerability to VF under nonischemic conditions because the number of VF-free tolerated premature pulses was dependent on [Ca2+]i. This relationship may only be detectable if evaluated by sequential pulse methods. These findings suggest that the method of VF threshold determination may be crucial for the result of studies testing Ca2+antagonists or situations of altered [Ca2+]iand could explain controversial results of VF threshold studies testing Ca2+antagonists by varying methods.