Title of article
Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a UK case-control study
Author/Authors
AG Sutcliffe، نويسنده , , B Taylor، نويسنده , , K Saunders، نويسنده , , S Thornton، نويسنده , , BA Leiberman، نويسنده , , JG Grudzinskas، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
5
From page
2080
To page
2084
Abstract
Background
There have been reports suggesting that children born after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are at increased risk of neurodevelopmental delay. We have undertaken a case-control study of this issue.
Methods
We studied 208 singleton children conceived by ICSI and a control group of 221 normally conceived singleton children. Children were recruited from 22 fertility centres and local nurseries throughout the UK. Controls were selected to match cases as closely as possible for social class, maternal educational attainment, region, sex, and race. The primary outcome measure was neurodevelopmental scoring; secondary measures were perinatal outcomes, postnatal health, and congenital abnormalities. A single examiner assessed all the children.
Findings
A follow-up rate of 90% for the ICSI group was achieved at a mean age of 17 months. No difference between the study children and controls was found in mean neurodevelopmental scores (98–08 [SD 10–93] vs 98–69 [9–99]) or any subscales on the Griffithsʹ scales of mental development. Perinatal outcome was similar apart from a higher rate of caesarean section (73 [35·1%] vs 53 [24·0%], p=0·015) and a lower mean birthweight (3163 [SD 642] vs 3341 [606] g, p=0·013) in the study group. Rates of major congenital abnormality were also similar overall (ten [4·8%] study vs ten [4·5%] control), although there were significantly more congenital anomalies among children born to fathers with oligozoospermia than in other children.
Interpretation
This population study did not show any significant difference between children conceived after ICSI and their naturally conceived peers in terms of physical health and development.
Journal title
The Lancet
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
The Lancet
Record number
565444
Link To Document