Title of article
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care
Author/Authors
Deborah Tumbull، نويسنده , , Ann Holmes، نويسنده , , Noreen Shields، نويسنده , , Helen Cheyne، نويسنده , , Sara Twaddle، نويسنده , , W Harper Gilmour، نويسنده , , Mary McGinley، نويسنده , , Margaret Reid، نويسنده , , Irene Johnstone، نويسنده , , Ian Geer، نويسنده , , Gillian Mcllwaine، نويسنده , , C Burnett Lunan، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages
6
From page
213
To page
218
Abstract
Background
Midwife-managed programmes of care are being widely implemented although there has been little investigation of their efficacy. We have compared midwife-managed care with shared care (ie, care divided among midwives, hospital doctors, and general practitioners) in terms of clinical efficacy and womenʹs satisfaction.
Methods
We carried out a randomised controlled trial of 1 299 pregnant women who had no adverse characteristics at booking (consent rate 81·9%). 648 women were assigned midwife-managed care and 651 shared care. The research hypothesis was that compared with shared care, midwife-managed care would produce fewer interventions, similar (or more favourable) outcomes, similar complications, and greater satisfaction with care. Data were collected by retrospective review of case records and self-report questionnaires. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Findings
Interventions were similar in the two groups or lower with midwife-managed care. For example, women in the midwife-managed group were less likely than women in shared care to have induction of labour (146 [23·9%] vs 199 [33·3%]; 95% CI for difference 4·4–14·5). Women in the midwife-managed group were more likely to have an intact perineum and less likely to have had an episiotomy (p=0·02), with no significant difference in perineal tears. Complication rates were similar. Overall, 32·8% of women were permanently transferred from midwife-managed care (28·7% for clinical reasons, 3·7% for non-clinical reasons). Women in both groups reported satisfaction with their care but the midwife-managed group were significantly more satisfied with their antenatal (difference in mean scores 0·48 [95% CI 0·41–0·55]), intrapartum (0·28 [0·18–0·37]), hospital-based postnatal care (0·57 [0·45–0·70]), and home-based postnatal care (0·33 [0·25–0·42]).
Interpretation
We conclude that midwife-managed care for healthy women, integrated within existing services, is clinically effective and enhances womenʹs satisfaction with maternity care.
Journal title
The Lancet
Serial Year
1996
Journal title
The Lancet
Record number
570958
Link To Document